Wild Manes welcome! Art and screencaps from Wild Manes and other horse-adjacent shows are now allowed!
Chat with us on Discord! We have a discord server! It can be found here.
Interested in advertising on Manebooru? Click here for information!
YayPonies: Download unacceptably derped Derpy!

Hosting an imageboard costs money - help support us financially!

Description:

Auto-imported from derpibooru.org (2140245)

Page 803 — Essentially Dubious

For those who don't know, the Essentials versions of certain 4e classes are simplified, reconfigured variants for newer players or players looking for a simpler, more classic approach to the classes on offer. The simplification gets panned first for removing options and continuing to dumb things down for D&D's widening audience at the time. Honestly, in my opinion, you can make a case for any of them from a new player, roleplaying, or flavor standpoint.

The more long-term criticism that's managed to stick is that just about all the Essentials classes are not very good at their player roles — Leader, Striker, Controller, etc. — to the point of having relatively little to contribute to combat. Depending on who you ask, not only are some of the Essentials classes underpowered, but so far below par that they're almost dead weight.

I've played a few Essentials characters, and some of them seem pretty bad. But overall I've had mixed results.

EDIT: Count on the comments section to generate some strong counterarguments, though!

Transcript:
Twilight Sparkle: So… do we have to make the exact same characters as before? Or can we change things up a little?
DM: Considering the circumstances, you can change just about all of your powers if you want. Or subclasses, even, if you want to get out of the Essentials handbooks. For instance, Fluttershy could switch from a Druid (Sentinel) to the original Druid or the (Protector).
Applejack: Though Sentinel's the one that focuses on the animal companion.
Fluttershy: I think I'll stay with that, then. If that's alright, I mean. I don't want to be a burden.
Rainbow Dash: That brings up something I've wanted to ask from the start. Why the heck has Rarity been a Rogue (Thief) this whole time?! It's not like this is your first campaign!
Rarity: Oh, you know I'm not a min-maxer. Unless the "min" happens to be "combat" and the "max" is "roleplaying."



Upvotes at import: 8 | Stars at import: 6
Posted previously at: 2019-09-09T18:46:59
safe1002594 artist:newbiespud1323 edit86057 edited screencap48883 screencap196631 character:applejack97829 character:fluttershy116461 character:pinkie pie120524 character:rainbow dash130046 character:rarity105354 character:twilight sparkle172848 character:twilight sparkle (unicorn)10082 species:earth pony146767 species:pegasus191328 species:pony678468 species:unicorn190179 comic:friendship is dragons1458 episode:griffon the brush-off605 g4287730 my little pony: friendship is magic163640 angry16810 annoyed3639 book20825 bookcase122 clothing303241 comic66768 dialogue45655 female753915 flying25092 freckles18873 glowing horn13024 golden oaks library3128 hat53836 horn35528 mane six16712 mare303220 reading4036 screencap comic3665 smiling157132 worried2581

Comments

Please log in to write comments. If you are logged in, you can post anonymously.
0 comments posted