Wild Manes welcome! Art and screencaps from Wild Manes and other horse-adjacent shows are now allowed!
Chat with us on Discord! We have a discord server! It can be found here.
Interested in advertising on Manebooru? Click here for information!
YayPonies: Download unacceptably derped Derpy!

Hosting an imageboard costs money - help support us financially!

Description:

Auto-imported from derpibooru.org (2140245)

Page 803 — Essentially Dubious

For those who don't know, the Essentials versions of certain 4e classes are simplified, reconfigured variants for newer players or players looking for a simpler, more classic approach to the classes on offer. The simplification gets panned first for removing options and continuing to dumb things down for D&D's widening audience at the time. Honestly, in my opinion, you can make a case for any of them from a new player, roleplaying, or flavor standpoint.

The more long-term criticism that's managed to stick is that just about all the Essentials classes are not very good at their player roles — Leader, Striker, Controller, etc. — to the point of having relatively little to contribute to combat. Depending on who you ask, not only are some of the Essentials classes underpowered, but so far below par that they're almost dead weight.

I've played a few Essentials characters, and some of them seem pretty bad. But overall I've had mixed results.

EDIT: Count on the comments section to generate some strong counterarguments, though!

Transcript:
Twilight Sparkle: So… do we have to make the exact same characters as before? Or can we change things up a little?
DM: Considering the circumstances, you can change just about all of your powers if you want. Or subclasses, even, if you want to get out of the Essentials handbooks. For instance, Fluttershy could switch from a Druid (Sentinel) to the original Druid or the (Protector).
Applejack: Though Sentinel's the one that focuses on the animal companion.
Fluttershy: I think I'll stay with that, then. If that's alright, I mean. I don't want to be a burden.
Rainbow Dash: That brings up something I've wanted to ask from the start. Why the heck has Rarity been a Rogue (Thief) this whole time?! It's not like this is your first campaign!
Rarity: Oh, you know I'm not a min-maxer. Unless the "min" happens to be "combat" and the "max" is "roleplaying."



Upvotes at import: 8 | Stars at import: 6
Posted previously at: 2019-09-09T18:46:59
safe1001708 artist:newbiespud1323 edit86042 edited screencap48873 screencap196587 character:applejack97812 character:fluttershy116433 character:pinkie pie120514 character:rainbow dash130021 character:rarity105332 character:twilight sparkle172807 character:twilight sparkle (unicorn)10070 species:earth pony146534 species:pegasus190989 species:pony677726 species:unicorn189844 comic:friendship is dragons1458 episode:griffon the brush-off605 g4287214 my little pony: friendship is magic163617 angry16795 annoyed3633 book20812 bookcase122 clothing302979 comic66733 dialogue45553 female753073 flying25058 freckles18848 glowing horn12977 golden oaks library3128 hat53777 horn35204 mane six16710 mare302401 reading4034 screencap comic3665 smiling156781 worried2580

Comments

Please log in to write comments. If you are logged in, you can post anonymously.
0 comments posted