Wild Manes welcome! Art and screencaps from Wild Manes and other horse-adjacent shows are now allowed!
Chat with us on Discord! We have a discord server! It can be found here.
Interested in advertising on Manebooru? Click here for information!
Click to find out how!

Hosting an imageboard costs money - help support us financially!

Description:

Auto-imported from derpibooru.org (2140245)

Page 803 — Essentially Dubious

For those who don't know, the Essentials versions of certain 4e classes are simplified, reconfigured variants for newer players or players looking for a simpler, more classic approach to the classes on offer. The simplification gets panned first for removing options and continuing to dumb things down for D&D's widening audience at the time. Honestly, in my opinion, you can make a case for any of them from a new player, roleplaying, or flavor standpoint.

The more long-term criticism that's managed to stick is that just about all the Essentials classes are not very good at their player roles — Leader, Striker, Controller, etc. — to the point of having relatively little to contribute to combat. Depending on who you ask, not only are some of the Essentials classes underpowered, but so far below par that they're almost dead weight.

I've played a few Essentials characters, and some of them seem pretty bad. But overall I've had mixed results.

EDIT: Count on the comments section to generate some strong counterarguments, though!

Transcript:
Twilight Sparkle: So… do we have to make the exact same characters as before? Or can we change things up a little?
DM: Considering the circumstances, you can change just about all of your powers if you want. Or subclasses, even, if you want to get out of the Essentials handbooks. For instance, Fluttershy could switch from a Druid (Sentinel) to the original Druid or the (Protector).
Applejack: Though Sentinel's the one that focuses on the animal companion.
Fluttershy: I think I'll stay with that, then. If that's alright, I mean. I don't want to be a burden.
Rainbow Dash: That brings up something I've wanted to ask from the start. Why the heck has Rarity been a Rogue (Thief) this whole time?! It's not like this is your first campaign!
Rarity: Oh, you know I'm not a min-maxer. Unless the "min" happens to be "combat" and the "max" is "roleplaying."



Upvotes at import: 8 | Stars at import: 6
Posted previously at: 2019-09-09T18:46:59
safe997104 artist:newbiespud1323 edit85941 edited screencap48823 screencap196207 character:applejack97742 character:fluttershy116293 character:pinkie pie120431 character:rainbow dash129897 character:rarity105249 character:twilight sparkle172520 character:twilight sparkle (unicorn)10026 species:earth pony144808 species:pegasus189081 species:pony673703 species:unicorn187956 comic:friendship is dragons1458 episode:griffon the brush-off605 g4284985 my little pony: friendship is magic163527 angry16677 annoyed3601 book20667 bookcase122 clothing301656 comic66586 dialogue45132 female748723 flying24801 freckles18564 glowing horn12772 golden oaks library3123 hat53513 horn33526 mane six16692 mare298533 reading4005 screencap comic3664 smiling154794 worried2560

Comments

Please log in to write comments. If you are logged in, you can post anonymously.
0 comments posted